AVRCFB Model
All predictionsWeek 7 · Sat Oct 17 · 5:00 PM
Away
The Citadel
—
8p
#8Home
Texas A&M
0-0 · AVR 76.5
57p
CIT 0%100% TA&M
Spread
TA&M -48.7
Total
65
Moneyline
CIT—TA&M—
Margin σ
14.1

Key players

Top-rated players, and who is out
Texas A&M
WRMario Craver
85.513/777
LBDaymion Sanford
82.739/878
SMarcus Ratcliffe
80.688/1427
QBMarcel Reed
80.221/308
LBRay Coney
78.869/878
CBRickey Gibson III
78.4108/1427

also out — Target After Missing, Former Texas A&M OL (OL), star safety (S), Chace Sims (DL), DT Sims, McGuire (OL), Myles (WR), Player 1 +3 more

Projected margin

80% between 32 and 66
-3+3+7+14PKTA&M +48.795% interval: 25.8 to 71.780% interval: 32 to 65.5+32+66CIT wins 0%TA&M wins 100%

Scorelines

Brighter is likelier
most likely ≈ TA&M 56–7 CITTA&M 53–32 CIT neighborhood · ~0.4% of outcomesTA&M 56–28 CIT neighborhood · ~1.0% of outcomesTA&M 60–25 CIT neighborhood · ~1.8% of outcomesTA&M 63–21 CIT neighborhood · ~2.5% of outcomesTA&M 67–18 CIT neighborhood · ~2.9% of outcomesTA&M 70–14 CIT neighborhood · ~2.5% of outcomesTA&M 74–11 CIT neighborhood · ~1.7% of outcomesTA&M 77–7 CIT neighborhood · ~0.9% of outcomesTA&M 81–4 CIT neighborhood · ~0.4% of outcomesTA&M 49–28 CIT neighborhood · ~0.5% of outcomesTA&M 53–25 CIT neighborhood · ~1.2% of outcomesTA&M 56–21 CIT neighborhood · ~2.2% of outcomesTA&M 60–18 CIT neighborhood · ~3.2% of outcomesTA&M 63–14 CIT neighborhood · ~3.6% of outcomesTA&M 67–11 CIT neighborhood · ~3.1% of outcomesTA&M 70–7 CIT neighborhood · ~2.2% of outcomesTA&M 74–4 CIT neighborhood · ~1.1% of outcomesTA&M 77–0 CIT neighborhood · ~0.5% of outcomesTA&M 46–25 CIT neighborhood · ~0.6% of outcomesTA&M 49–21 CIT neighborhood · ~1.4% of outcomesTA&M 53–18 CIT neighborhood · ~2.6% of outcomesTA&M 56–14 CIT neighborhood · ~3.7% of outcomesTA&M 60–11 CIT neighborhood · ~4.1% of outcomesTA&M 63–7 CIT neighborhood · ~3.6% of outcomesTA&M 67–4 CIT neighborhood · ~2.4% of outcomesTA&M 70–0 CIT neighborhood · ~1.3% of outcomesimpossible (total < margin)TA&M 42–21 CIT neighborhood · ~0.6% of outcomesTA&M 46–18 CIT neighborhood · ~1.4% of outcomesTA&M 49–14 CIT neighborhood · ~2.6% of outcomesTA&M 53–11 CIT neighborhood · ~3.8% of outcomesTA&M 56–7 CIT neighborhood · ~4.2% of outcomesTA&M 60–4 CIT neighborhood · ~3.7% of outcomesTA&M 63–0 CIT neighborhood · ~2.5% of outcomesimpossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)TA&M 39–18 CIT neighborhood · ~0.6% of outcomesTA&M 42–14 CIT neighborhood · ~1.3% of outcomesTA&M 46–11 CIT neighborhood · ~2.4% of outcomesTA&M 49–7 CIT neighborhood · ~3.5% of outcomesTA&M 53–4 CIT neighborhood · ~3.9% of outcomesTA&M 56–0 CIT neighborhood · ~3.4% of outcomesimpossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)TA&M 35–14 CIT neighborhood · ~0.5% of outcomesTA&M 39–11 CIT neighborhood · ~1.1% of outcomesTA&M 42–7 CIT neighborhood · ~2.0% of outcomesTA&M 46–4 CIT neighborhood · ~2.9% of outcomesTA&M 49–0 CIT neighborhood · ~3.3% of outcomesimpossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)TA&M 32–11 CIT neighborhood · ~0.4% of outcomesTA&M 35–7 CIT neighborhood · ~0.8% of outcomesTA&M 39–4 CIT neighborhood · ~1.5% of outcomesTA&M 42–0 CIT neighborhood · ~2.2% of outcomesimpossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)impossible (total < margin)84777063564942totalTA&M +21TA&M +35TA&M +49TA&M +63TA&M +77margin →